Peggy's podcast
As we all know, Webquests were invented by Bernie Dodge and Tom March at San Diego State University in 1995. A WebQuest is a learning activity used by educators. During this activity learners read, analyze, and synthesize information using the World Wide Web. The students nowadays are familiar with using computer and searching online. On the other hand, the teachers today have more difficulties about creating a webquest by themselves. There is no doubt that it takes time to finish a good webquest. From Tom March’s article, the definition of a well-designed Webquest is a combination of research-supported theories and the effectiveness of using the internet for dependable instructional practices. Question one: In March’s article, he presents three examples of WebQuests that he feels are bad examples. Why? In Tom March’s article, he provided three examples of WebQuests that he feels are bad examples. First and foremost, a group of students plan a road trip in the United States and be prepared to present it by the Power Point Slides. Therefore, teacher assigned students in the group charge different parts of the assignment. For example, one may need to find the attractions in the states and arrange the budget and another student need to book the accommodations and organizing meal. Form my pint of view, there are several disadvantages on this Webquest example. It is not a well-designed Webquest because there is nothing about researched supported theories. Moreover, there is no clear and understandable processes that tell the learners how to do. Let’s take a glance at the second example that was mentioned in Tom’s article, the same problems happened in this Webquest, too. There is no instruction which tell the learner how to do step by step. Last example shows that the word “students” is not suit the require guild of making a well-designed Webquest, we can use “you” here. To combine the reasons of the three bad examples of Webquest, there is no useful links for students to request and there is no clear instruction that tell the learner what to do and how to do. Question 2: As you are looking at the WebQuests, think about what you have read, but also think about what appeals to you. Which WebQuests successfully motivate you to complete the task? What is it about them that keeps you interested. what the best WebQuests had in common.?…The best webquests inspire students to see richer thematic relationships, to contribute to the real world of learning, and to reflect on their own metacognitive processes.” A teacher can search for WebQuests on a particular topic or they can develop their own using a web editor like Microsoft FrontPage or Dreamweaver. When I mad my own Webquest as a final project of EESL 521, I evaluate a successful Webquest in three ways. First, the well-designed WebQuest allows students to increase their computer technology skills, do research, and discover what they didn’t know or just now a bare knowledge. Second, WebQuests can be done solo, with a partner, or in small groups. Third, the instructions on the process pages should be very clear and with lots of available useful links. Web Quest Examples Webquest examples in http://www.webquest.org/search/index.php When type “tour” in the search blank, it showed “23 WebQuests found.” Therefore, I clicked into every Webquest and look up each pages. Some of them are designed for young learners and some of them created for ESL learners. There are two Webquest that I love share with you and I would definitely use it in my class. First one called “Discover London Webquest”, it’s visual able and the process part is very clear to understand. Another Webquest that I love to use is “Washington DC Class Webpage Project!”. This Webquest has very clear teacher information and it’s really help ESL teachers to make their teaching plan easily. I’d live to use them as a new tech-material in my English class, my students are all Digital natives and they surely loved it. read less
Mon December 08 2008
As we all know, Webquests were invented by Bernie Dodge and Tom March at San Diego State University in 1995. A WebQuest is a learning activity used by educators. During this activity learners read, analyze, and synthesize information using the World Wide Web. The students nowadays are familiar with using computer and searching online. On the other hand, the teachers today have more difficulties about creating a webquest by themselves. There is no doubt that it takes time to finish a good webquest. From Tom March’s article, the definition of a well-designed Webquest is a combination of research-supported theories and the effectiveness of using the internet for dependable instructional practices. Question one: In March’s article, he presents three examples of WebQuests that he feels are bad examples. Why? In Tom March’s article, he provided three examples of WebQuests that he feels are bad examples. First and foremost, a group of students plan a road trip in the United States and be prepared to present it by the Power Point Slides. Therefore, teacher assigned students in the group charge different parts of the assignment. For example, one may need to find the attractions in the states and arrange the budget and another student need to book the accommodations and organizing meal. Form my pint of view, there are several disadvantages on this Webquest example. It is not a well-designed Webquest because there is nothing about researched supported theories. Moreover, there is no clear and understandable processes that tell the learners how to do. Let’s take a glance at the second example that was mentioned in Tom’s article, the same problems happened in this Webquest, too. There is no instruction which tell the learner how to do step by step. Last example shows that the word “students” is not suit the require guild of making a well-designed Webquest, we can use “you” here. To combine the reasons of the three bad examples of Webquest, there is no useful links for students to request and there is no clear instruction that tell the learner what to do and how to do. Question 2: As you are looking at the WebQuests, think about what you have read, but also think about what appeals to you. Which WebQuests successfully motivate you to complete the task? What is it about them that keeps you interested. what the best WebQuests had in common.?…The best webquests inspire students to see richer thematic relationships, to contribute to the real world of learning, and to reflect on their own metacognitive processes.” A teacher can search for WebQuests on a particular topic or they can develop their own using a web editor like Microsoft FrontPage or Dreamweaver. When I mad my own Webquest as a final project of EESL 521, I evaluate a successful Webquest in three ways. First, the well-designed WebQuest allows students to increase their computer technology skills, do research, and discover what they didn’t know or just now a bare knowledge. Second, WebQuests can be done solo, with a partner, or in small groups. Third, the instructions on the process pages should be very clear and with lots of available useful links. Web Quest Examples Webquest examples in http://www.webquest.org/search/index.php When type “tour” in the search blank, it showed “23 WebQuests found.” Therefore, I clicked into every Webquest and look up each pages. Some of them are designed for young learners and some of them created for ESL learners. There are two Webquest that I love share with you and I would definitely use it in my class. First one called “Discover London Webquest”, it’s visual able and the process part is very clear to understand. Another Webquest that I love to use is “Washington DC Class Webpage Project!”. This Webquest has very clear teacher information and it’s really help ESL teachers to make their teaching plan easily. I’d live to use them as a new tech-material in my English class, my students are all Digital natives and they surely loved it. read less
Mon December 08 2008
As everyone know, blogs and podcasts become much more popular than ten years ago. Of course, it is a tornado effect for all people around the world especially to young people. For example, most of my classmate in Taiwan have their own blogs even my father has his own website with blog. Some of them write something important or worth to memory everyday. On the other hand, some of them just try to complain some daily detail things and they also expect their friends can response them as a encouragement and consolation. There is no doubt that teachers can take advantage of the popularity of blogs and podcasts. First and foremost, there are also some English teacher’s blogs which are my favorite blogs. Moreover, I have more than ten links about these teacher’s blogs. These ESL teacher share their teaching plans, songs, ways to teach, methods of encourage students or even the way to teach how to celebrate Halloween. Through these blogs, I don’t even know these teachers but I can learn a lot how to teach. It is just like a short cut and it always work.However, by using blogs and podcast, students can receive the feedbacks from teachers as soon as possible. For example, when we use blackboard and PBwikirs. Last but not least, most of teenager in the world are crazy about facing to the computer, the advantages for teacher is easier get students’attention in a short time. I still can remember when I took an English course at SUNY Stony Brook. My teacher use “pronunciation power” to correct my intonation. I totally agree that Web 2.0 is worse than what we think. With Google’s purchase of video-sharing website YouTube for $1.6 billion, the “Web 2.0” goldrush is officially underway, and everyone is scrambling to freshen up their tired old online venture. How worse is the dangerous carried by web 2.0? Here is a good example: Recently a colleague of Ray Everett-Church suggested the professor try a service called Meebo which allows you to send and receive instant messages from all the major IM services through one interface. All you have to do is give Meebo your usernames and passwords for all your accounts and let them be the intermediary for all your online interactions thereafter. Moreover, the facebook, blogs, or yahoo mail every web sites who asks you to create your account and password is not that safe any more. My account was stolen half years ago. Ironically, I need to pay 20 dollars for the thief who uses my account to sell “fake Nike shoes”. From my point of view, “Wisdom of the crowd phenomena” is not always right. A crowd phenomenon is a type of thought exhibited by group members who try to minimize conflict and reach consensus without critically testing, analyzing, and evaluating ideas. Individual creativity, uniqueness, and independent thinking are lost in the pursuit of group cohesiveness, as are the advantages of reasonable balance in choice and thought that might normally be obtained by making decisions as a group. The blog effect may cause people to make hasty, irrational decisions, where individual doubts are set aside. The term is frequently used pejoratively, with hindsight. We can easily find out that the closer they are, the less likely they are to raise questions that might break the cohesion. And we also can find some bloger just do copy and paste. As the example that was given by Professor Peggy: Even if 100 blogs say the same thing, it does not make it true. The “crowd” is not always wise. As a result, we should think more crititally and logically to avoid following the crowd. read less
Wed December 03 2008
These questions were asked for this podcast. March’s article, he presents three examples of WebQuests that he feels are bad examples. Why are they bad examples and explore 10 to 20 webquests and find one you would use and why? The bad examples given in March’s article were a team planning a trip, collect facts and images and make a poster with the information, and to create a brochure, diorama and audio guide. The reason that these are all bad examples of webquests, is because these assignments are based on regurgitation. Meaning the students o suppose to find the information and cut and paste. There isn’t any critical thinking needed all the bad examples had the students just finding information and representing it. But march states that “a real Webquest is a scaffolded learning structure that uses links to essential resources on the world wide web and an authentic task to motivate students investigation of a open-ended question………The best webquests inspire students to see richer thematic relationships, to contribute to the real world of learning, and to reflect on their own metacognitive processes.” So when it comes to a good webquest, that webquest encourages student to analyze and come up with their own ideas and results. Open ended questions motivate students to find their own ideas and are even encouraging because there never any wrong ideas, just different suggestions. When it comes to the examples that were on the webquest website, there were a few things that stood out amongst the ones that I really liked. One as the fact that the directions were easily understood. Two there wasn’t so much information or side topics on the webquest that would side track the student from what the main assignment was. The webquests used topics that were relevant to the students and the information could be needed or used at some point in their life. And with people in general when the information that we are learning we can actually relate to, it draws us even more to the topic and we as people are likely to put extra effort into that assignment. The information on the webquest was useful and the resources and links that were noted and used really pertained to the webquest. The information was focused and stayed on tract. One important part of the webquests was the rubrics. Some of the rubrics had too many expectations and the terms used to explain what was expected really needed to be put more simply. The ones that I liked the expectations were reader friendly. The webquest that I could see myself using in a class was called find a need and feel it. I really liked it because the concept was simple. The student was to think about the community that they lived in and come up with something that needed to be improved or created. I really liked that webquest, one, because it allowed the students to personalize the assignment. Two because the students can not only come up with any idea, but the ideas that they come up with, if it really motivates them they can try to put it into action. And any assignment that encourages students to make a difference in their community or be more involved in their community that is always a plus. The questions that were asked were very thought provoking although very simple and allowed for all types of directions for the students to go in. Even though I was suppose to just explore several webquests, when I came upon this particular webquest I was actually trying to answers the questions for myself because I was so interested in it. So I would present this webquest to my students and hope that they would possess the same interest that I had when reading it. read less
Wed December 03 2008
Web 2.o, the so –called second generation of internet has arrived, which includes blogs, wikis, podcasting, photo sharing sites. It has become so popular that a great number of language learners using it without teachers assigning. Teachers nowadays are taking great advantages of its popularity. There are many ways that teachers can use to take the advantages of its popularity. Blogs and podcasting are very beneficial to promote the initiative and spontaneity of students in language production. According to Swain’s Pushed Out Theory, no-one really learn a language unless outputting in that language. And second language learners are especially unwilling to output in target language which greatly impedes their progress, so they must be pushed by teachers frequently to output. However blogs and podcasting easily resolve the problem by providing a creative and interesting environment so attractive and intriguing to young students that they actually come out of strong desires to produce in target language without realizing doing so. Therefore we teachers should encourage students to write and edit their bogs or podcasting, which would give them best incentives to take an active part in language production. Another way of taking the advantages of blogs and podcasting is that by having students to write on-line journal daily. Online Journaling is very important to improve output of the language, because it forced student to reflect and organize their thoughts and put it into words or text. Students can write down their response to specific question or just simply telling their everyday experiences. For example everyday we give 15 minutes to students to write about their day. Students will gradually grasp the techniques to generalize happenings and give prominent position to the key points by writing themselves or reading and commenting other peers’ journals. And most of importance they learn to organize their thoughts and output into target language. Last but not least, in speaking class, students can use blogs and podcasting as a way to practice pronunciation skills that they are learning. The advanced adult learners that I taught before have good command of reading and writing skills. However their oral English is hard to understand due to their inaccurate pronunciation. In a traditional classroom, students aren’t able to practice speaking after class. Because without compare the accurate pronunciations, students cannot improve their speaking. But with Podcasting and blogs teachers can record the words and sample sentences and upload on Blogs. After class, students will first view the podcast and then record their own video. In this way, students can compare the difference between the sample words and sentences and their own pronunciations. I think the advantages of web2.0 outweigh than its disadvantages. It empowers our creativity, flattens the social hierarchies and democratizes the media. It has changed the people’s life style so dramatically that more people use internet now than TV. And we are greatly benefited from web2.0. As far as students are concerned, information is much more accessible and the process of looking for information became simple and easy. But we still need to be aware of some negative effects of it as Keen foresees. Such as the truth information maybe drowned by the false information. It is very likely that our students might be absorbing the wrong and improper information from Internet. And also one thing that Keen really concerned about is “personalization”. He argued that web 2.0 is too much about personalization that we read and use internet according to our own preferences. It is true that his concerns are reasonable. Thus as being a teacher, it is our responsibility to teach our students to how to differentiate the false information from Internet. When comes to the” too much personalization”, we need to proper educate our students to have a balance of their own thoughts and outsider world. In conclusion, even the second generation of Internet-web 2.0 does have its downsides, it is not “as worse as you can think”. “The wisdom of the crowd phenomena” that Keen mentioned is phenomena that students perceived the wrong and false information from internet and acknowledged as the truth for it was granted by the Crowd or Public. This is like when the “majority” endorse the ‘bad’ or ‘wrong’ opinion about certain information for long enough time, this information will eventually accept as Truth. To prevent students from becoming the victims of the ‘the wisdom of the crowd phenomena’, I will teach my students the skills or capabilities to discern or filter the information which was reap from the internet. The students have to learn to find prove to back up the information they gathered from internet. I will design a curriculum aiming to teach how to critically use websites, blogs and videos. The ‘REDCAB’ we used in class will be a great model to teach students how to evaluate the accurate information on the internet. read less
Wed November 26 2008
In the last decade the internet has had a great impact on the way that students learn and process information. It has given the students the abilities to express their opinions freely without being persecuted and looked down upon. This new sense of expressive freedom, has lead to thousands of blogs and podcasts to be created. Teachers can take advantage of this by creating activities that cause students to analyze and create their own opinions about information that they learn within the classroom. For example after teaching students about the Bill of Rights, have them blog what changes they think still need to be made to the constitution. This will allow the students to come up with their own ideas and express them. Instead of reading information and regurgitating the same thoughts, discussion boards can be used or even skype where it can allow students to discuss openly. And analyze what their classmates are thinking regarding a particular topic. Also teachers can use it get better connected with their students. We live in such a fast paced society, where people check their e-mails and blackboards all day and text instead of talking the on phone. So teachers and students will be more accessible to each other and can have more open communication when it comes to students needing assistance and teachers needing to give advice. I disagree with keen that Web 2.o is worse than you think. Because with all things there are advantages and disadvantages when using it. Filtering information is a big deal, especially with students using the internet for information. So teachers need to give lessons to their students on how to use the information that they acquire on the internet. Letting them know that not all information is good information and how to tell from what is fact from fiction. This can be done by even making lists of websites that are particular filled with nothing but opinions. So that students can know what websites to use when they are doing research and what websites to avoid. Once that information is givien and understood. Walking students through step by step so that there is clear directions will elevate a lot of problems. And turn Web 2.0 as a wonderful tool to use. The wisdom of crowd phenomena, is basically opinions of what people think about a certain topic. Sometimes that information can be right, wrong or somewhere in between. Many of websites that are out there are based both opinions and facts, mixed together. To have students better understand the wisdom of crowd, I would ask my class a question, how to get black permanent marker off a white silk blouse. Whether they know the answer or not all would give an answer. Then I would post all the answers on the board, and I would point out that this an example of the results you would get from the internet. Students will have the right answer up on the board but at the same time the teacher will explain that some are the answers are wrong. Just like when doing a search for information on the internet some of the websites and information will be factual but some may not be. Wisdom of the crowd is not always bad either, because when needing information some may have experienced or tried different things to get to the same result. So at the same time you can get a broader view on the information by using their knowledge. read less
